Technical Leader Worries: I Am Not a Born Leader

Table of Contents

Technical Leader Worries: I Am Not a Born Leader

Have you ever heard about Alexander the Great, Napoleon, J. F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King? I bet you have. These are great historical leaders. These names often come to mind when we think about leadership. When coupled with Hollywood movie characters, we imagine leaders as heroes with strong charisma and exceptional talent for public speaking. This stereotype is hard to shake. But wait a minute… Is this what we should adhere to when talking about technical leaders?

I conducted a survey among software developers and technical leaders, asking about the characteristics of a specific technical leader they appreciated and had encountered in their lives. What do you think they listed?

Technical Leader Sample Actions (from Survey Answers):

  • Asking questions to analyze problematic situations
  • Mediating
  • Not forcing a particular solution
  • Isolating the team from external distractions
  • Engaging, especially in critical situations
  • Reminding the team of their goals
  • Encouraging focus on solutions more than the problems themselves

Sample Skills and Attitudes:

  • Knowledge and experience
  • Communication
  • Patience
  • Mediation
  • Risk-taking
  • Negotiation

Sample Values:

  • Openness
  • Relationships
  • Peace
  • Courage
  • Goal orientation

So, there isn’t much about being a brave hero. Instead, technical leaders must be great problem solvers and team supporters. Most great leaders I’ve met are like that. They focus on their team and are committed to doing great work.

As technical leaders, we must ensure things get done, remove impediments, and create environments where team members want to belong. Unlike charisma, these skills can be developed over time—you don’t need to be born with them, and this is good news.

For those who love models, I can tell you that there are different types of leadership (and indeed many different models). The stereotype we are accustomed to is known as charismatic leadership, but it isn’t the only style. There are also transformational, visionary, transactional, and servant leadership styles you can read more about it here. What we need most in our industry is a mix of transformational and servant leadership.

(top image source: dccomics.com)

(Text translated and moved from original old blog automatically by AI. May contain inaccuracies.)

Related Posts

Is Poland Christ of Nations?

I recently came across a very interesting article about the pitfalls of the Polish style of management and its historical roots. It is more generic than just IT but includes aspects of participatory management, such as Agile practices. If you understand Polish, you can read the article here.

Read More

A Few Words About Naming – Methods (In Progress)

Note: This article is a work in progress!

Maybe the topic seems trivial and worn-out, as everyone knows that you need to create clear, unambiguous names. However, it’s still a greatly neglected area. Teams are still far from understanding that the most depends on naming. No refactoring has as much power as changing a name. It is primarily the names, if used correctly, that form what is called self-documenting code, creating a clear language in the source code of the system you are building.

Read More

Simple, Complicated, Complex, and Chaotic Systems: The Cynefin Framework

Perhaps you’ve previously encountered concepts such as complex systems, complicated systems, or complex adaptive systems, for instance when reading Jurgen Appelo’s Management 3.0, or when considering Ken Schwaber’s thoughts on the applicability of Scrum. This might sound intriguing, but it can be difficult to find logical sense in it if one lacks a certain theoretical foundation. This is where it’s worthwhile to examine Dave Snowden’s concept called Cynefin, which is based on complex systems theory, anthropology, evolutionary psychology, and cognitive psychology.

Read More