Meeting Deadlines at All Costs is a Mistake!

Table of Contents

The Necessity of Deadlines

Deadlines are necessary. Whether you work in Scrum (Agile) or a waterfall-like methodology, one thing is certain: without deadlines, there is no motivation. According to Parkinson’s Law (no relation to the disease), deadlines are essential.

The Problem with Rigid Deadline Adherence

The problem arises when it becomes apparent that a deadline cannot be met. The classic approach is to meet the deadline at all costs. This is a mistake!

The Dark Side of Meeting Deadlines at All Costs

Take a moment to consider the dark side of rigid deadline adherence…

(For those who don’t enjoy thinking for themselves, you may skip to the next section ;-) )

Commonly discussed consequences include:

  • Overtime (detrimental to mental health and inefficient—debatable),
  • Technical debt.

However, the consequences are more severe:

Teams That Meet Deadlines at All Costs Do Not Learn!

They learn that it’s acceptable to indulge in poor practices, inefficient work methods, and lack assertiveness if the deadline approaches and working hours are stretched while ignoring (or turning a blind eye to) quality. I call this Stress-Driven Development! :-)

Rigid Deadline Adherence Reinforces Poor Project Practices

It’s naive to believe that simply missing a deadline is a solution. It is not! By itself, it achieves nothing. Tools for drawing conclusions and implementing them are also necessary.

Facing the Reality of Unmet Deadlines

When you realize you will not meet a deadline, you must inform your team lead if you are a developer. If you are a team lead, tell the project manager. If you are the manager, inform the client and/or a higher-level manager/director—it may hurt. That’s why you often don’t do it; you prefer to be non-assertive or stretch your time or principles to meet the deadline. That’s the entire mechanism.

When it hurts (though there are less painful/painless methods), you will have a real chance to learn something. Then, you will truly grow and have the motivation to change the process instead of reinforcing its inefficiency.

(Text translated and moved from original old blog automatically by AI. May contain inaccuracies.)

Related Posts

Deconstructing LLM Agents for software engineers - Beyond the Hype

Deconstructing LLM Agents for software engineers - Beyond the Hype

Introduction

Agents, agents, agents everywhere. To be clear: AI agents. Oh, sorry—to be precise, LLM agents. A lot of buzz surrounds these agents. They were called the most important AI innovation of 2024, and now they’re touted as the hottest topic of 2025. But is this something we truly need? What exactly are they? Are all agents the same? Let’s dive deeper into the subject.

Read More

Code Cleanup: Not Just About Refactoring Part 3

Introduction

Due to formatting issues on the blogspot, it is advisable to read this article as a PDF file. You can download the PDF version of the article here.

Read More

Simple, Complicated, Complex and Chaotic Systems, in Other Words Cynefin. And How Does It Relate to Software Development?

Intro

You might have already come across terms such as complex systems, complicated systems, or complex adaptive systems; especially, if you have read Management 3.0 by Jurgen Appelo or heard about Ken Schwaber’s ideas about the applicability of Scrum. It might sound intriguing, but finding logic in it is difficult without some background theory. This is the point at which Dave Snowden’s Cynefin concept comes in handy. This concept is based on complex systems theory, anthropology, evolutionary psychology, and, last but not least, cognitive psychology.

Read More